Discussion (Chapter 7): What are the common challenges with which sentiment analysis deals? What are the most popular application areas for sentiment analysis? Why?
Note: The first post should be made by Wednesday 11:59 p.m., EST. I am looking for active engagement in the discussion. Please engage early and often.
Your response should be 250-300 words. Respond to two postings provided by your classmates.
There must be at least one APA formatted reference (and APA in-text citation) to support the thoughts in the post. Do not use direct quotes, rather rephrase the author’s words and continue to use in-text citations.
Most of the topics covered centers around the concept of using “functional dependency” in analyzing data for information preservation, minimal dedundancy, and for reducing modification anomolies. The context of this discussion is a top-down (analysys) approach to relation designing. Continuing with approach this week, our author(s), using the theory of normal forms and functional dependency, presents a further set of topics related to inferring new functional dependencies from a given data set; notations are discussed including closure, cover, minimal cover, and equivalence. Second, the desirable properties of nonadditive (lossless) joins and preservation of functtional dependencies is discussed. A general algorithm to test for non additivity of joins among a set of relations is presented. This chapter then closes with a discussion of multiple topics specific to the bottom-up (synthesis) approach to database designs.
Also refer to the article shared, and your own research:
Discuss what is meant by the closure of a set of functional dependencies? Illustrate with and example.
Discuss why normal forms alone is insufficient as a condition for a good schema design.
Discuss what is the lossless (or nonadditive) join property of a decomposition. Explain why is it important.
This is the third in a series of five sequential assignments (the course project) in which you continue to act as the Chief Technology Officer (CTO) of a hypothetical e-commerce start-up company of your design.You have been working on delivering an information technology project plan in anticipation of the company relocating to a new facility.
In the first course project deliverable, you created a project plan inception document and supporting Gantt chart.
In the second course project deliverable, you developed the business requirements to be incorporated into the information systems design you are creating. You also updated your original supporting Gantt chart based on major and minor tasks identified in the business requirements document.
In this third course project deliverable, you will create an infrastructure design that considers the key elements of software, hardware, security, and business process flow for your e-commerce startup company. You will also use graphics tools to create a supporting data flow diagram (DFD) for your infrastructure design. The infrastructure design provides an opportunity to visualize the key elements and how they are connected for maximum effectiveness.This assignment consists of two-parts:
Part 1: Infrastructure Design
You will create an 8–10 page infrastructure design document to include key technical elements for your hypothetical e-commerce company’s information systems infrastructure.
Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
You will use Microsoft Project to again update the supporting project Gantt chart begun in your first course project deliverable:
You are not creating a new Gantt chart, only updating the one you created in the previous assignment with the major and minor tasks uncovered while creating the infrastructure design document.
You are to create or infer all necessary assumptions to successfully complete this assignment.
You must submit both parts as separate files to the assignment area. Label each file name according to the appropriate part.
Part 1: Infrastructure Design Document
Write an 8–10 page infrastructure design document in which you:
Identify the major hardware and software components of your hypothetical e-commerce company’s information systems infrastructure.
Design your e-commerce company’s hardware (database, proxy servers, network equipment) and software (analytics, big data, API, content management) from a size, scale, type, and interoperability standards perspective.
Document the potential security vulnerabilities and a security design for your e-commerce company.
Use graphics tools to create a data flow diagram (DFD) for your e-commerce company.
Use three sources to support your writing. (Choose sources that are credible, relevant, and appropriate. Cite each source listed on your source page at least one time within your assignment. Access the library or review library guides for help with research, writing, and citation.)
Part 2: Updated Gantt Chart
Use Microsoft Project to:
Update the previously created Gantt chart with the major and minor tasks identified in the infrastructure design document.
This course requires the use of Strayer Writing Standards. For assistance and information, please refer to the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left-hand menu of your course. Check with your professor for any additional instructions. Note the following:
The preferred method is for the infrastructure design portion of your assignment to be typed, double-spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides.
Include a cover page containing the assignment title, your name, your professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page is not included in the required page length.
Include a source list page. Citations and references must follow SWS format. The source list page is not included in the required page length.
The specific course learning outcome associated with this assignment is:
Propose a design to address hardware, software, and security aspects of an entity’s information systems infrastructure.
What baseline security requirements t should be applied to the design and implementation of applications, databases, systems, network infrastructure, and information processing when considering cloud computing within an enterprise risk management frameworks ?Your paper should meet the following requirements:
Be approximately four to six pages long, not including the required cover and reference pages.
Follow APA7 guidelines. Your paper should include an introduction, a body with fully developed content, and a conclusion.
Support your answers with the readings from the course and at least two scholarly journal articles to support your positions, claims, and observations, in addition to your textbook. The school Library is a great place to find resources.
Use excellent grammar and style techniques to be clear and well-written, concise, and logical. You are being graded in part on the quality of your writing.
You have interviewed an accomplished engineer for a new position at your firm. However, you decided to hire someone with more international experience. Write how would you begin the first paragraph of your letter to the engineer who is not getting the new position?
Mr. Robert Drake has joined your company as a senior software developer with several years of software engineering experience. As the manager in charge, please send an email to all of the software engineers introducing them to Mr. Drake. You can make up any information you need for this email. Please be sure this is a professional email with no errors.
Based on the article attached. Consider a presented use case and determine whether GFI LanGuard or MBSA would be a better fit to scan and analyze the use case environment, and then provide both a management summary and more detailed decision justification. Please write 2 pages in APA7 format with in-text citations and reference minimum of two scholarly articles.
Communication: The Key to Work (COM200041VA016-1228-001)
Help from Prof. Brazil
Strayer Writing Standards
Week 6 Assignment
Week 6 AssignmentWeek 6 Assignment: Reaching a Common Goal Through Collaboration
Due: Week 6
Points: 150Skill(s) Being Assessed: Relationship Building – Collaboration, (Self and Social Awareness)In Week 4, you created your Group Project Plan and began working on your common group goal. This week, you’ll analyze and reflect on the collaborative process.Criteria for Success: In this assignment, you will:
Provide clear and comprehensive documentation of the common goal the team has completed.
Describe team process, including each specific person’s role and responsibilities and how these were established.
Identify collaborative tools (or potential tools used) and explain how they supported (or would support) work towards a common goal, with specific examples.
Describe 2–3 effective collaborative approaches or strategies and how they were used by the group to accomplish the team’s goal, including concrete examples.
Describe challenges and opportunities for improvement in collaborative teamwork, including specific examples.
What to submit/deliverables: A completed Reflection on Collaborative Strategies in Meeting a Common Goal [DOCX].What is the value of doing this assignment? This assignment gives you the opportunity to practice your relationship building skill, further developing your interpersonal interactions and collaboration techniques. It will show that you can collaborate with others to resolve a problem and work toward a common goal.Almost every job application lists communication as a requirement. We’ve all had experiences—whether on the playground, over text, or in a parent-teacher conference—where we know we could have communicated more clearly and effectively. This assignment asks you to use what you’ve learned in the course about interpersonal interaction, collaborating in small groups, and responding in the workplace to complete a common goal and reflect on the collaborative strategies or approaches used. Worried about where to start? The good news is that you’ve already established a foundation with these skills by reading Chapters 2, 5, and 20 in The Art of Public Speaking. You will use what you learned in those chapters to help you complete this assignmentYour goal for this assignment is to: Complete a common goal with a team and reflect on the collaborative strategies and approaches used.What you need to complete this assignment: To complete this assignment, you will need the following resources:
Assignment Overview Video.
Reflection on Collaborative Strategies in Meeting a Common Goal Template [DOCX].
Steps to complete: In Week 6, complete and submit your assignment in BlackBoard using the following steps:STEP 1: Document your progress and the outcome of the common goal your team worked together on. This can be in the form of a picture, document, or other evidence of collaborating towards achieving the group goal. A few examples of documentation are a picture of the group collaborating, before and after pictures of goal completion, or a screenshot of group progress (calendar, list, tracking chart, etc.).STEP 2: Download the Reflection on Collaborative Strategies in Meeting a Common Goal Template [DOCX] and complete all sections.STEP 3: Upload the completed document to the Assignment 3 link in Week 6 of Blackboard.
I need to have a project for MIS, and here is the idea:
where the people are facing problems in buying the right clothes that fit with their body size and skin tone color and accordingly they become dissatisfied and return the clothes. sometimes we see a product but it looks different than displayed retailers websites, hence we will create a technology where a customer can choose online their body share with it’s pear or apple (different body shape) and choose the sizes of their bust, hips, shoulders, sleeves, dress length, height, weight, skin tone.. etc then by the next step it shows a podium that shows similar to reality how the clothing would look like on the body and skin tone. pls check the requirements in the attachments.. i need the content in word file and a professional power point for presentation with charts, statistics of clothes return times in US for example or europe, to highlight the reason of choosing this project and solving a problem that customers face. in addition to relate all of that to MIS
Select any example of a visualization or infographic, maybe your own work or that of others. The task is to undertake a deep, detailed ‘forensic’ like assessment of the design choices made across each of the five layers of the chosen visualization’s anatomy. In each case your assessment is only concerned with one design layer at a time.For this task, take a close look at the annotation choices:
Start by identifying all the annotation features deployed, listing them under the headers of either project or chart annotation
How suitable are the choices and deployment of these annotation features? If they are not, what do you think they should have been?
Go through the set of ‘Influencing factors’ from the latter section of the book’s chapter to help shape your assessment and to possibly inform how you might tackle this design layer differently
Also, considering the range of potential annotation features, what would you do differently or additionally?
Submit a two-page document answering all of the questions above. Be sure to show the visualization first and then thoroughly answer the above questions. Ensure that there are at least two-peer reviewed sources utilized this week to support your work.