What factors contribute to the problem?

You have been hired as a global health consultant to make evidence-based recommendations on the development of a program to address a critical health problem in a resource-poor low/middle-income country setting.
The paper will have three sections:
Section 1: Problem Description. You must first describe the problem using available literature and data sources (the evidence!). What is the nature of the problem? Who is affected by it? What factors contribute to the problem?
1.1. Define the assigned problem and discuss why it is important to global public health.
1.2. Report on the estimated prevalence of the problem globally, regionally (e.g., Africa), and within your specific geographic area (e.g., Ghana), and mortality, morbidity, and other estimates (e.g., DALYs) if available and relevant.
1.3. Discuss the most basic immediate (proximal) causes of the problem in physiological, environmental, behavioral or other terms (e.g., diarrhea is caused by ingestion of a minimum quantity of pathogenic organisms; vitamin A deficiency is caused by inadequate intake or absorption, often following an illness that produced an increased need for the micronutrient)
1.4. Identify any important relationships between this condition and other problems (e.g., pneumonia is a common complication of measles), and other information relevant to understanding the nature of the problem (e.g., environmental or cultural factors that significantly increase risk).
Section 2: Describe two major evidence-based intervention(s) that currently addresses this problem in your chosen setting. Be as specific as you can.
Section 3: Evidence-based conclusions and recommendations. Based on your understanding of the problem and what you now know about possible interventions, describe what you would recommend as the best evidence-based solution(s), and specifically state your reasons for this. Given what is being done now, what alternative intervention might you propose for this problem, or, what might you do differently to optimize the effectiveness of existing interventions? You should evaluate, compare, and contrast the existing interventions as the basis for proposing an optimum effective intervention.
3.1. Conclude your evidence-based recommendations for programmatic interventions to address this problem.
3.2. Discuss any potential barriers to implementation anticipated in your chosen setting and suggestions on how to overcome these.
Write a five-page minimum paper, not including title or reference page, discussing the items listed above following APA 7th Edition Guidelines. Follow the rubric as a guide to writing the paper. Papers must be typed, 12 font, double spaced, and free of grammatical and spelling areas. Use a minimum of 5, current (within the past five years) references (at least 3 or more peer-reviewed references; the remaining can be from professional sources such as the National Institute of Health, World Health Organization, etc.). References from sites ending in .com and .edu are not acceptable references. References from sites ending in .org and .gov are acceptable references.
you can have 30 hours to do the assignment

Define the assigned problem and discuss why it is important to global public health.

You have been hired as a global health consultant to make evidence-based recommendations on the development of a program to address a critical health problem in a resource-poor low/middle-income country setting.
The paper will have three sections:
Section 1: Problem Description. You must first describe the problem using available literature and data sources (the evidence!). What is the nature of the problem? Who is affected by it? What factors contribute to the problem?
1.1. Define the assigned problem and discuss why it is important to global public health.
1.2. Report on the estimated prevalence of the problem globally, regionally (e.g., Africa), and within your specific geographic area (e.g., Ghana), and mortality, morbidity, and other estimates (e.g., DALYs) if available and relevant.
1.3. Discuss the most basic immediate (proximal) causes of the problem in physiological, environmental, behavioral or other terms (e.g., diarrhea is caused by ingestion of a minimum quantity of pathogenic organisms; vitamin A deficiency is caused by inadequate intake or absorption, often following an illness that produced an increased need for the micronutrient)
1.4. Identify any important relationships between this condition and other problems (e.g., pneumonia is a common complication of measles), and other information relevant to understanding the nature of the problem (e.g., environmental or cultural factors that significantly increase risk).
Section 2: Describe two major evidence-based intervention(s) that currently addresses this problem in your chosen setting. Be as specific as you can.
Section 3: Evidence-based conclusions and recommendations. Based on your understanding of the problem and what you now know about possible interventions, describe what you would recommend as the best evidence-based solution(s), and specifically state your reasons for this. Given what is being done now, what alternative intervention might you propose for this problem, or, what might you do differently to optimize the effectiveness of existing interventions? You should evaluate, compare, and contrast the existing interventions as the basis for proposing an optimum effective intervention.
3.1. Conclude your evidence-based recommendations for programmatic interventions to address this problem.
3.2. Discuss any potential barriers to implementation anticipated in your chosen setting and suggestions on how to overcome these.
Write a five-page minimum paper, not including title or reference page, discussing the items listed above following APA 7th Edition Guidelines. Follow the rubric as a guide to writing the paper. Papers must be typed, 12 font, double spaced, and free of grammatical and spelling areas. Use a minimum of 5, current (within the past five years) references (at least 3 or more peer-reviewed references; the remaining can be from professional sources such as the National Institute of Health, World Health Organization, etc.). References from sites ending in .com and .edu are not acceptable references. References from sites ending in .org and .gov are acceptable references.
you can have more that one day like 39 hours

How would you design a new clinical practice guideline for the facility once the systematic review is complete?

Part 1: Critique quality of the literature reviews conducted for two different types of studies- a quantitative and qualitative research. • Identify and discuss the research questions, sampling and sampling sizes, research designs (qualitative vs. quantitative), hypothesis, data collection methods, and research findings. • Discuss the credibility of the sources and the research/researchers findings. • 400-word minimum/550-word maximum without the references. • Minimum of 3 references (the course textbook must be one of the references) in APA format, must have been published within last 3-5 years.
(Book: Nursing Research: Methods and Critical Appraisal for Evidence-Based Practice. 10th/edl
Part 2: Discussion Question:You are the Director of Nursing in an Oncology Unit in a large teaching medical center that is university-affiliated. You are concerned that the IV catheter insertion technique and orientation program currently being used with new registered nurses is not as effective as other methods.How would you perform a systematic review of the evidence on this subject?
How would you design a new clinical practice guideline for the facility once the systematic review is complete?

Describe how the process/impact/outcome of the intervention was measured.

Class Project: A Health Program Plan
Students enrolled in PHC 274 in fall 2022 will be divided into groups (5-7 students per group).The first section will be designed to gain general information about the intervention program. The second section will be designed to assess the student’s ability to plan an intervention program.The group has 8 points to cover under the main intervention characteristics section. The third section will be designed to assess the group’s ability to provide basic information about the implementation and evaluation process. The three-sections written intervention plan must be completed and submitted to the instructor no later than 11:59 PM on (November 12, 2022).
General program information
Name of the program.
Country and region (if applicable) where the program is based.
Time period (start and end dates).
Funding sources.
Give a short description of the program (maximum of about 250 words).
Main intervention characteristics
Describe the overall aim(s) of the intervention.
List the SMART objectives of the intervention.
Describe the target group(s) of the intervention
Literature review: basing the intervention on current scientific knowledge and/or theoretical models and/or previous experience from other projects?
Describe the needs assessment that has been carried out.
Describe the environmental factors (i.e. factors beyond individual control) that the intervention addresses, if any.
Does the intervention have a special focus on vulnerable groups (socioeconomically disadvantaged people, ethnic minorities, children, elderly people, etc.)? if yes, specify the vulnerable groups.
Describe the involvement of stakeholders in the planning phase of the intervention and specify the stakeholders, including and not limited to: if the target group(s) was/were involved in setting the objectives and designing the intervention.
Indicate the demographic and socioeconomic factors of the target population that have been measured. E.g. age, gender, income/socioeconomic status, education, occupation…etc.

Implementation, Monitoring, and Evaluation
Provide details of the pilot study if a pilot study has been performed.
Describe the activities that have been carried out.
Describe which stakeholders were involved in the implementation and describe their roles.
Describe how the process/impact/outcome of the intervention was measured.
To what extent have the objectives indicated earlier been achieved?
Conclusion and recommendations.

The written report will be assessed for clarity and succinctness in providing the required information using a rubric of 0 (undeveloped/inadequate) to 3 (outstanding/exceptional), as illustrated below:

Provide the reference list entry for this article in apa style followed by a three-paragraph annotation that includes:a summary

You can find a link to the newest webinar on how to prepare “annotated bibliographies” on the following page:
http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/webinars/graduate#s-lg-box-2773871
Your Week 8 Assignment is almost exactly the same as Week 6 Assignment. They both even use the same grading rubric. If you do poorly in your Week 6 assignment, please go back to take a look of the rubric again and make sure you cover everything in the rubric for the Week 8 Assignment.
One difference is: You need to review a paper using QUALITATIVE research method. Thus, please make sure you select a correct article.
Provide the reference list entry for this article in APA Style followed by a three-paragraph annotation that includes:A summary
An analysis
An application as illustrated in this example
Format your annotation in Times New Roman, 12-point font, double-spaced. A separate References list page is not needed for this assignment.
Submit your annotation.
Annotated Bibliography
Aquino, E. M., Silveira, I. H., Pescarini, J. M., Aquino, R., Souza-Filho, J. A. D., Rocha, A. D. S., … & Lima, R. T. D. R. S. (2020). Social distancing measures to control the COVID-19 pandemic: potential impacts and challenges in Brazil. Ciencia & saude coletiva, 25, 2423-2446.