Did this issue cause a delay?

Hello Students:
I recommend that you read thoroughly the sample root cause analysis
in order to best support yur journey in completion of this Group of 2 assignment. Then check out the Rubric below in order to maximize your score.
DO NOT use a Safety Incident, Injury, or Fatality. This is a quality control course NOT safety.
DO NOT use the COLLAPSE of the FIU pedestrian bridge. Or any other bridge for that matter. Don’t use a case study that I can easily google and find.
DO NOT use ANY COLLAPSE of any kind.
DO NOT use the following cases which can readily be found on the internet:
Boston Big Dig Ceiling COLLAPSE.
Ronan Point Apartment Building COLLAPSE.
Mexico Metro Line No. 12 COLLAPSE.
Dee Bridge COLLAPSE.
Sydney Opera House.
2000 Commonwealth Building COLLAPSE in Boston, Massachusetts.
Avero Concord Hotel Walkway COLLAPSE.
Minneapolis Metrodome Roof COLLAPSE.
Skyline Plaza Building COLLAPSE, Virginia, USA.
Champlain Towers COLLAPSE at Surfside.
Sampoong Department Store COLLAPSE.
Miami-Dade College Parking Garage COLLAPSE at the West Campus.
The Citigroup Center in NY was designed by William J. LeMessurier in the early 1970s.
University Proton Therapy Clinic roof COLLAPSE.
Hyatt Place, Omaha, Nebraska.
Oxgangs Primary School Edinburgh Wall Failure.
Deuxieme Maison building, home to FIU’s school of mathematics and statistics.
Dhaka Garment Factory COLLAPSE.
Georgia Dome COLLAPSE.
Sultanah Bahiyah Hospital.
International Nutrition Facility Plant COLLAPSE.
Mardi Gras Casino roof COLLAPSE due to Hurricane Irma.
A quality issue shall deal with materials and or workmanship. Please do not use the sample root cause analysis provided herein as a template. Come up with your own. Photos, drawings, sketches, and diagrams are encouraged, not just words, in your written report.
A written report is also required.
If you found it on the Internet then so can I.
Rubric Below
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWhatWhat quality problem / Rework happened? What specifically went wrong?
5 ptsFull Marks
Vivid description of what went wrong from the standpoint of Quality.
3 ptsRequirement Met
Quality issue identified. And what went wrong.
0 ptsRequirement not met
Did not succinctly and clearly state WHAT went wrong.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCorrective ActionsHow was the problem fixed? What steps were taken?
5 ptsFull Marks
Stated succinctly how the problem was solved and described the steps.
3 ptsRequirement met
Stated how the problem was fixed and supplied a cursory description of the steps.
0 ptsNo Marks
Did not state how the problem was resolved or the steps to cure.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePreventive ActionsWhat process or steps will be implemented in order to prevent this problem from happening again? Describe in detail.
5 ptsFull Marks
Detailed description of the process or steps to be implemented to prevent the same issue from happening again.
3 ptsRequirement met
Described the preventive actions.
0 ptsNo Marks
Preventive actions were not identified.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCostsWhat were the costs to correct the problem? This is known as rework.
5 ptsFull Marks
A dollar figure was provided for the total costs to fix the problem.
3 ptsRequirement met
Provided some costs.
0 ptsNo Marks
Did NOT provide any costs.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScheduleWhat was the impact, if any, to the Overall Project Schedule? Did this issue cause a delay? How did it affect the Critical Path?
5 ptsFull Marks
Clearly identified whether the schedule was impacted or not and by how much time.
3 ptsRequirement met
Time impact to the Critical Path was provided.
0 ptsNo Marks
Nothing stated about the time impact to the schedule.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation SkillsThe professor will assess the students presentation and public speaking skills. Voice, vocal variety, body language, English language and grammar, distractions.
5 ptsFull Marks
Used vivid descriptive proper language, did not use filler words, used vocal variety and body language.
3 ptsRequirement met
Minimal use of notes.
0 ptsNo Marks
Poor presentation skills, looking at and reading the screen.
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRoot Cause(s)List the causes(s) for the failed quality.
5 ptsFull Marks
The Root Cause(s) were clearly identified.
3 ptsRequirement met
Root cause was identified loosely.
0 ptsNo Marks
Root cause was not clearly identified.
5 pts
Total Points: 35