Is there any aspect of either author’s argument or the assumptions underpinning it with which you strongly disagree?

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Dear freelancer, You are to write a three-page APA response to both articles based on the guideline and agree with Mueller’s point of view that things would have been the same even without a nuclear weapon. The articles are attached as well as the full instructions.
The purpose of this assignment is to encourage you to read and think critically. In your essay, you should briefly summarize the arguments of the two authors (Mueller and Jervis). You should clearly identify each author’s thesis and outline the evidence/arguments he uses to support it. Remember that these two authors, while they are in agreement on some matters, fundamentally disagree on the primary issue addressed in both articles.
You must identify this fundamental point of disagreement in your essay. Be sure to identify as well any particular assumptions on which the author’s argument depends. (Note that two different theoretical perspectives are exemplified in these two articles. You should be able to identify which author is a realist and which is a liberal.)The remainder of the paper should comprise your personal response to the article. (No more than half the paper should be devoted to summarizing the authors’ arguments.)
In formulating your response, you will want to consider the following questions: Which author’s argument do you find more persuasive? (Keep in mind that they disagree on a fundamental point, so it is simply not possible to be in agreement with both.) Why? Does the evidence offered by each author credibly support the argument that he is making? Is there any aspect of either author’s argument or the assumptions underpinning it with which you strongly disagree? Do the conditions upon which each author’s argument rests still exist? If not, what has changed and why? Are the arguments relevant to thinking about the nuclear weapons problem today? (Please note that these articles were published prior to the end of the Cold War.)What are the implications for international politics of the argument you found most persuasive?

Place your order now for a similar assignment and have exceptional work written by our team of experts, At affordable rates

For This or a Similar Paper Click To Order Now

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *